Dallas, Texas · Technology consulting since 201635 services · 3 practices · 8 industries Technology in ActionPartnershipsMedia817-968-0523
Banking & Financial Services · Confidential client

Cyber Crisis and Continuity Readiness for a Mortgage Servicer

Borrower payments kept posting in a simulated loss of the servicing platform, with every decision owner named in advance.

Client name withheld by agreement
Client
Residential mortgage servicer, 600,000 loans
Region
Plano, Texas
Year
2024
Duration
11 weeks
Scope
31 critical processes · 12 key vendors · board simulation
Practice
Offensive Security & Resilience

The challenge

What was at stake.

A residential mortgage servicer handles payments, escrow and loss mitigation for 600,000 loans on behalf of investors and government agencies. Its continuity plans assumed a building outage, not the loss of its servicing platform to ransomware.

Missed borrower payments, escrow disbursements or investor remittances carry regulatory, contractual and reputational cost within days. The board wanted to see the plan work before it was needed.

What we did

The approach, step by step.

  1. 01

    Processes ranked by deadline

    We analyzed 31 critical processes against the dates they cannot miss, from daily payment posting to monthly investor reporting and tax and insurance disbursements.

  2. 02

    Vendor dependencies tested

    Twelve key vendors, including the core servicing platform and payment processors, were reviewed for recovery commitments and contract notice terms.

  3. 03

    Workarounds built and timed

    Manual payment posting, escrow disbursement and borrower communication procedures were written and timed with the people who would run them.

  4. 04

    Board simulation

    An escalating ransomware scenario took executives and directors through isolation, investor notice, regulator contact and the decision to pay or rebuild.

  5. 05

    Risk register updated

    Every gap from the exercise went into the enterprise risk register with an owner, a date and a board reporting line.

Outcomes

What changed, in numbers.

31
critical processes with tested workarounds
12
key vendors reviewed for recovery terms
5
decision gaps closed after the simulation
100%
of investor remittance deadlines met in the exercise
When the simulation got hard, everyone in the room already knew whose decision it was.
Chief Risk Officer, client name withheld
Facing something similar?

Let’s talk about your version of this.

Share what you are up against. A senior practitioner who has delivered this kind of work will reply within one business day.